WE-159. Critical Illness Neuropathy in Severe COVID-19: a case series

Introduction: Neurological complications of SARS-CoV-2 disease have received growing attention, but only few studies have described to date clinical and neurophysiological findings in COVID patients during their stay in intensive care units (ICUs). Here, we assessed the presence of either critical illness neuropathy (CIP) or myopathy (CIM) in ICU patients. Method(s): Patients underwent a neurophysiological assessment, including bilateral examination of the median, ulnar, deep peroneal and tibial motor nerves and of the median, ulnar, radial, and sural sensory nerves. Needle electromyography (EMG) was performed for both distal and proximal muscles of the lower and upper limbs. The technique of Direct Muscle Stimulation (DMS) was applied either to the deltoid or tibialis anterior muscles. Peak to peak amplitudes and onset latencies of the responses evoked by DMS (DMSamp, DMSlat) or by motor nerve stimulation (MNSamp, MNSlat) were compared. The ratio MNSamp to DMSamp (NMR) and the MNSlat to DMSlat difference (NMD: MNSlat-DMSlat) were also evaluated. Result(s): Nerve conduction studies showed a sensory-motor polyneuropathy with axonal neurogenic pattern, as confirmed by needle EMG. Both MNSamp and NMR were significantly reduced when compared to controls (p < 0.0001), whereas MNSlat and NMD were markedly increased (p = 0.0049). Conclusion(s): We have described COVID patients in the ICU with critical illness neuropathy (CIP). The predominance of CIP as compared to critical illness myopathy (CIM) has implications for the functional recovery and rehabilitation strategies in severe COVID-19. Copyright © 2022

Brainstem damage in COVID-19

Background and aims: It has recently been proposed that SARS-CoV-2 might spread through the nervous system in a prion-like way, reaching respiratory centers in the brainstem. Here, we evaluated neuropathologically, neurophysiologically and clinically the brainstem involvement in COVID-19. Methods: Neuropathological data were acquired from patients died for COVID-19 and COVID-19 negative;neuronal damage and the number of corpora amylacea (CA)/mm2 were assessed. The expression of the nuclear proteinof SARS-Cov-2 was also evaluated. To clarify whether neuropathological findings had a functional correlate, we studied the blink reflex (BR) in 11 COVID-19 patients, admitted to our Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and compared data both with healthy subjects and non COVID- 19 ICU patients. An extensive neurological examination, comprising the corneal and glabellar reflexes, was also performed. Results: Autopsies showed a high percentage of neuronal damage and a higher number of CA in the medulla oblongata of COVID-19 patients;immunohistochemistry revealed the presence of SARS-Cov-2 virus in the brainstem. Neurophysiologically, the RII component of the BR was selectively impaired in COVID-19 and, clinically, the glabellar reflex reduced or absent. Conclusion: Our findings provide the first combined neuropathological, neurophysiological and clinical evidence of SARS-Cov-2-related brainstem involvement, especially at the medullary level, suggesting a neurogenic component of respiratory failure.

The international European Academy of Neurology survey on neurological symptoms in patients with COVID-19 infection.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although the main clinical features of COVID-19 infection are pulmonary, several associated neurological signs, symptoms and diseases are emerging. The incidence and characteristics of neurological complications are unclear. For this reason, the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) core COVID-19 Task Force initiated a survey on neurological symptoms observed in patients with COVID-19 infection. METHODS: A 17-question online survey was made available on the EAN website and distributed to EAN members and other worldwide physicians starting on 9 April 2020. RESULTS: By 27 April 2020, proper data were collected from 2343 responders (out of 4199), of whom 82.0% were neurologists, mostly from Europe. Most responders (74.7%) consulted patients with COVID-19 mainly in emergency rooms and in COVID-19 units. The majority (67.0%) had evaluated fewer than 10 patients with neurological manifestations of COVID-19 (neuro COVID-19). The most frequently reported neurological findings were headache (61.9%), myalgia (50.4%), anosmia (49.2%), ageusia (39.8%), impaired consciousness (29.3%) and psychomotor agitation (26.7%). Encephalopathy and acute cerebrovascular disorders were reported at 21.0%. Neurological manifestations were generally interpreted as being possibly related to COVID-19; they were most commonly recognized in patients with multiple general symptoms and occurred at any time during infection. CONCLUSION: Neurologists are currently and actively involved in the management of neurological issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic. This survey justifies setting up a prospective registry to better capture the prevalence of patients with neuro COVID-19, neurological disease characteristics and the contribution of neurological manifestations to outcome.

EAN consensus statement for management of patients with neurological diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has posed multiple challenges to the practice of clinical neurology including recognition of emerging neurological complications and management of coexistent neurological diseases. In a fast-evolving pandemic, evidence-based studies are lacking in many areas. This paper presents European Academy of Neurology (EAN) expert consensus statements to guide neurologists caring for patients with COVID-19. METHODS: A refined Delphi methodology was applied. In round 1, statements were provided by EAN scientific panels (SPs). In round 2, these statements were circulated to SP members not involved in writing them, asking for agreement/disagreement. Items with agreement >70% were retained for round 3, in which SP co-chairs rated importance on a five-point Likert scale. Results were graded by importance and reported as consensus statements. RESULTS: In round one, 70 statements were provided by 23 SPs. In round two, 259/1061 SP member responses were received. Fifty-nine statements obtained >70% agreement and were retained. In round three, responses were received from 55 co-chairs of 29 SPs. Whilst general recommendations related to prevention of COVID-19 transmission had high levels of agreement and importance, opinion was more varied concerning statements related to therapy. CONCLUSION: This is the first structured consensus statement on good clinical practice in patients with neurological disease during the COVID-19 pandemic that provides immediate guidance for neurologists. In this fast-evolving pandemic, a rapid response using refined Delphi methodology is possible, but guidance may be subject to change as further evidence emerges.